[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080228204146.GE8953@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:41:47 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Nebojsa Miljanovic <neb@...atel-lucent.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kittlitz, Edward (Ned)" <nkittlitz@...atel-lucent.com>,
asweeney@...atel-lucent.com,
"Polhemus, William (Bart)" <bpolhemus@...atel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEADDR not allowing server and client to use same port
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:19:26PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Currently, Linux does not allow reuse of same local port for both TCP server and
> > TCP client. I understand that there may be a need to prevent two servers from
>
> Think about what happens for simultaneous connect (that obscure little
> corner of the tcp/ip spec). Now think about what it means for security.
>
> ALan
exactly. That's why I think that requiring the server to explicitly allow
socket reuse is mandatory. On another side of the problem, I really think
that we should make the simultaneous connect configurable. I've been patching
all of my own 2.4 kernels for a while to add a config option to turn it off
because there is a real security issue with this on. At least for mainline,
it should be a sysctl. No stateful firewall I know supports the feature, so
legitimate uses of this feature are likely very very small.
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists