[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080228213319.GC1232@vino.hallyn.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:33:19 -0600
From: serge@...lyn.com
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
xemul@...nvz.org, pj@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Prefixing cgroup generic control filenames with "cgroup."
Quoting Paul Menage (menage@...gle.com):
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Because if something is in /foo/bar/cgroup/notify_on_release then
> > prefixing the filename with "cgroup_" seems pretty pointless.
> >
>
> The point would be to avoid situations where a user has code that
> creates a group directory called "foo", and then in a future kernel
> release cgroups introduces a control file called "foo". If it's
> prefixed, then the user just has to avoid creating groups prefixed by
> "cgroup." or any subsystem name, so collisions will be less likely.
Have you already run into that case?
You said the set of files belong to cgroup itself is likely to increase
- do you have some candidates in mind? Perhaps ones which are likely
to conflict with choice taskgroup names?
If anything I'd say add a 'prefix_cgroup' mount option and use it to
decide whether to prefix or not (rather than use the noprefix option).
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists