[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080229174326.6b649ade.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:43:26 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] Generic semaphore implementation
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:10:54 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > I have put this in for toady's build (but using the git URL). This tree
> > is in the "too many conflicts and its out until fixed" category ...
>
> A shame.
>
> Most of the conflicts will be due to all the
>
> -#include <asm/semaphore.h>
> +#include <linux/semaphore.h>
>
> but they're all optional anyway, because include/asm-*/semaphore.h is
>
> #include <linux/semaphore.h>
>
> so either a) you just ignore all those conflicts or b) we ask Willy to
> remove all that stuff and we can trickle it in via subsystems later.
My conflict tolerance is already rising. i.e. I will fix up such trivial
to fix conflicts. I am more concerned with complexity of conflicts than
mere number (so "too many conflicts" should be read as "too many
conflicts that I can't figure out in a shortish period of time").
If it gets too bad, it falls into Linus' "the person who changes the APIs
bears the pain" basket. :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists