[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080228224923.fbbd97dc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:49:23 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Bill Nottingham <notting@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC, BAD IDEA] /proc/tty/console
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:18:57 -0500 Bill Nottingham <notting@...hat.com> wrote:
> The attached patch adds /proc/tty/console. The contents of it are
> simply a description of the current drivers attached to /dev/console.
> For example, a boot with 'console=ttyS3,115200n1 console=tty0' would
> yield:
>
> # cat /proc/tty/console
> unknown /dev/tty0
> serial /dev/ttyS3
I must say that the what-consoles-are-registered problem makes my head spin
sometimes too. Seems a worthy objective.
However I think that a bunch of plain old printks which are emitted when a
console is added or removed would suffice?
We should display each console's CON_foo flags too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists