[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080229090050.GA19519@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:00:50 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] add ALL_CPUS option to stop_machine_run()
* Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com> wrote:
>> -allow stop_mahcine_run() to call a function on all cpus. Calling
>> stop_machine_run() with a 'ALL_CPUS' invokes this new behavior.
>> stop_machine_run() proceeds as normal until the calling cpu has
>> invoked 'fn'. Then, we tell all the other cpus to call 'fn'.
>
> Jason, we're actually trying to reduce the usage of the stop_machine
> in general. [...]
please talk in your own name. Stop-machine is a very elegant tool that
simplifies a lot of hard things in the kernel and is reasonably fast as
well. We've just recently added two new usages of it and more are
planned.
_you_ might be the one who wants to 'reduce the usage of stop_machine' -
but that means it is _you_ who first has to convert a number of very
difficult pieces of code to "something else".
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists