lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C7F664.5040102@garzik.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:11:16 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
	Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: devres and requesting resources

Alan Cox wrote:
>> In converting to pcim_iomap_regions(), we no longer reserve /all/ 
>> regions, only the ones requested.
>>
>> This is actually a bug:  it was intentional to call 
>> pci_request_regions(), because that ensures that no other software will 
>> use our resources -- even if we are not actively using the resource in 
>> question.
> 
> That would be a bug. We should only reserve the regions we are using. It
> is possible that the other regions can be used correctly by another driver
> (consider the CS5520 or the MPIIX where the IDE is only part of one
> function of the PCI device).

Only rare PCI devices are shareable among multiple drivers.

sata_* at least intentionally used pci_request_regions() because it is 
obvious from the hardware spec that multiple regions accessed by 
multiple drivers is highly unlikely, without the driver being 
specifically coded to support such sharing.  Such sharing code is far 
beyond simple resource reservation, to avoid stepping on toes when there 
is a single MMIO region and set of interrupt clearing registers.

So reading your email it sounds like there are valid cases for both 
configurations.

Its a design choice either way, not a bug either way.

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ