[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C832AC.4040906@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:28:28 -0800
From: David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, systemtap@...rceware.org,
prasadav@...ibm.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] Trace code and documentation
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:38:48 -0800 "David J. Wilder" <dwilder@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> + if (strncmp(buf, "start", strlen("start")) == 0) {
>> + ret = trace_start(trace);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + } else if (strncmp(buf, "stop", strlen("stop")) == 0)
>> + trace_stop(trace);
>
> Does gcc manage to avoid the pointless strlen() calls here?
>
> It's a bit untidy that you can write "startfoo" in there and the kernel
> will happily accept it.
I agree. I will change it to something like this in my next update.
buf[count-1] = '\0';
if (strcmp(buf, "start") == 0) {
ret = trace_start(trace);
if (ret)
return ret;
} else if (strcmp(buf, "stop") == 0)
trace_stop(trace);
else
return -EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists