[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28962.1204303003@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:36:43 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit sources
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:25:58 EST, "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" said:
>
> Yes. The RPM contains only patches and the patches won't
> patch a 2.6.11 kernel either! Perhaps they need to be
> in some undefined order.
Umm... I just checked that specific RPM, and that RPM *does* contain all that
you need. In particular, the following *are* in there:
kernel-2.6.spec
linux-2.6.11.tar.bz2
patch-2.6.12-rc5-neutered.bz2 <- probably why they won't patch a 2.6.11
The spec file lists all the *.patch files and the order to apply them in. It
even has a whole bunch of *.config files.
Your best best is to 'rpm -ivh' that RPM - that will put the pieces in
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES and /usr/src/redhat/SPECS. 'rpmbuild kernel.spec'
(with appropriate flags, you probably want '--target x86_64' if you want
a 64-bit build only). Adding patches is a matter of dropping the patch in
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES and adding a few lines to the kernel-2.6.spec file.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists