linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] reserve end-of-conventional-memory to 1MB on 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1204305247.2037.2.camel@muff>
Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:14:07 +0000
From:	Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
To:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reserve end-of-conventional-memory to 1MB on 32-bit

On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 12:49 +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> This patch adds explicit detection of the EBDA and reservation
> of the rom and adapter address space 0xa0000-0x100000 to the
> i386 kernels. It uses reserve_bootmem instead of reserve_early,
> because reserve_early is not yet available on i386.
> 
> Before this patch, the EBDA size was hardcoded as 4Kb. Also, the 
> reservation of the adapter range was done by modifying the e820
> map which is now not necessary any longer, and the code is removed
> from copy_e820_map.
> 
> The changes in e820_64.c are only a change in the comment above
> copy_e820_map, and some changes of the types of local variables
> in that function such that the 32 and 64 bit versions become equal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
> 
> ---
> 
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:09:56PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 14:13 +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> > > The 32-bit code still uses reserve_bootmem, so this is not really
> > > a unification with the 64-bit version of the ebda reservation code,
> > > but at least it provides the same detection logic and reserves the
> > > same areas.
> > > 
> > > This does not crash immediately on qemu. No further testing was
> > > done! Otherwise:
> > 
> > I haven't tested extensively either but it does seem to solve the
> > problem for Xen.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > Ian
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> I think this is ready for -x86#testing.
> It boots to a small userspace in qemu (i386).
> If I should separate the cleanups, let me know.

	I haven't investigated in any detail, but with 2.6.25-rc3 and your
patch I'm seeing a Xen guest hit this BUG:

void __init smp_alloc_memory(void)
{
        trampoline_base = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
        /*                                                                      
         * Has to be in very low memory so we can execute                       
         * real-mode AP code.                                                   
         */
        if (__pa(trampoline_base) >= 0x9F000)
                BUG();
}

	Stack looks like:

  [<c137ef97>] smp_alloc_memory+0x25  <--
  [<c137ef97>] smp_alloc_memory+0x25 
  [<c137a500>] setup_arch+0x28e 
  [<c13735f7>] start_kernel+0x7a 
  [<c1379240>] xen_start_kernel+0x300 

Cheers,
Mark.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/