[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C849A7.7020607@qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:06:31 -0800
From: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> It of course lays waste to a series of cgroup patches from Paul Menage
>> which I already had queued.
>
> Andrew, please stop tracking sched-devel.git and track this tree
> instead:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
Another option is to have cpusets or cpu isolation tree that I've started
already. I was saying from the very beginning cpu isolation stuff does not
imho belong in the scheduler tree. Besides a tiny patch to the sched.c that
adds/removes the bitmaps there are no scheduler changes needed for this
specifically.
Peter, Ingo, if you guys are ok with this lets just have this stuff in
cpuisol-2.6.git. I'm anyway rebasing it ontop of Peter's work. Of course we'll
go through regular review and stuff and Andrew can track that tree separately.
Just a suggestion. I'm ok with submitting patches via sched-devel. Separate
tree seems more appropriate though.
Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists