linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] dma: document dma_{un}map_{single|sg}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1204310276.4003.48.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:37:56 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
Cc:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>, akepner@....com,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] dma: document dma_{un}map_{single|sg}_attrs()
	interface

On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:25 -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:45:46PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:24 PM,  <akepner@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > >  Document the new dma_{un}map_{single|sg}_attrs() functions.
> > >
> > >  diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt b/Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt
> > >  index e69de29..36baea5 100644
> > >  --- a/Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt
> > >  +++ b/Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt
> > >  @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > >  +                       DMA attributes
> > >  +                       ==============
> > >  +
> > >  +This document describes the semantics of the DMA attributes that are
> > >  +defined in linux/dma-attrs.h.
> > >  +
> > >  +
> > >  +DMA_ATTR_SYNC_ON_WRITE
> > >  +----------------------
> > >  +
> > >  +DMA_ATTR_SYNC_ON_WRITE is used on the IA64_SGI_SN2 architecture.
> > >  +It provides a mechanism for devices to explicitly order their DMA
> > >  +writes.
> > >  +
> > >  +On IA64_SGI_SN2 machines, DMA may be reordered within the NUMA
> > >  +interconnect. Allowing reordering improves performance, but in some
> > >  +situations it may be necessary to ensure that one DMA write is
> > >  +complete before another is visible. For example, if the device does
> > >  +a DMA write to indicate that data is available in memory, DMA of the
> > >  +"completion indication" can race with DMA of data.
> > >  +
> > >  +When a memory region is mapped with the DMA_ATTR_SYNC_ON_WRITE attribute,
> > >  +a write to that region causes all in-flight DMA to be flushed to memory.
> > >  +Any pending DMA will complete and be visible in memory before the write
> > >  +to the region with the DMA_ATTR_SYNC_ON_WRITE attribute becomes visible.
> > 
> > 
> > I'm not clear how this is all meant to work. Your intial patch says
> > this is an interface to pass "architecture-specific
> > attributes" from drivers through to the DMA mapping code, which is
> > fair enough - we want to do something similar.
> > 
> > But it's not clear that DMA_ATTR_SYNC_ON_WRITE is architecture
> > specific. If I was a driver writer might assume it works on all
> > platforms.
> 
> That would be a fair assumption. But it is required to be a NOP on
> platforms that don't need the "hint" ("attr" or whatever you want
> to call it). Specific architectures (SN2 in this case) will need
> to implement something.

To be honest, I still don't like the name.  SYNC_ON_WRITE is the SN2
implementation.  What it's actually doing is implementing strict
ordering semantics.  I think it should really be
DMA_ATTR_STRICT_ORDERING (with a corresponding
DMA_ATTR_RELAXED_ORDERING).

This means that if ever anyone sets a PCIe bridge to relaxed ordering by
default, this attribute will also work for them.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/