[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802291120000.31028@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:20:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Passing epoll file descriptors across Unix domain sockets
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> After all of the recent discussions about epoll, I've been reviewing
> other parts of the epoll.7 man page. In that page there is the
> following:
>
> Q5 Can I send the epoll file descriptor over a Unix
> domain socket to another process?
>
> A5 No.
>
> This does not seem accurate. I can understand that it makes no sense
> to pass a an epoll file descriptor over a Unix domain socket, because
> the receiving process does not have the file descriptors that are in
> the epoll set.
>
> However, it is indeed possible (no errors result) to pass an epoll fd
> over a Unix doman socket using SCM_RIGHTS. (I have just now tested
> this.)
>
> Can you clarify? I suspect the text should really read:
>
> Q5 Can I send an epoll file descriptor over a Unix
> domain socket to another process?
>
> A5 Yes, but it does not make sense to do this, since the
> receiving process would not have copies of the file
> descriptors in the epoll set.
>
> Does that seem okay?
Looks okay to me.
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists