linux-kernel - Re: A strange behavior of sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:42:13 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Kei Tokunaga <tokunaga.keiich@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: A strange behavior of sched_fair


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> > Seems the vruntime doesn't get re-set if you move tasks between 
> > groups. sched_move_task() should call place_entity() in the context 
> > of the new cfs_rq.
> 
> This should do I guess - uncompiled, untested

if someone tests it and if it solves the problem i'll apply it to the 
scheduler tree.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/