[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802291155480.11292@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:57:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement slub fastpath in terms of freebase and freeoffset
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Then we do not need the page->end field anymore right? I will try
> > to rediff your patch against current slab-mm and see how we can proceed
> > from there.
>
> I guess you could replace page->end with the (expensive)
> page_address(page) + 1 in new_slab.
>
> You would also have to change slab_address() to use
> page_address(page). Since this is used by check_valid_pointer, I am not
> sure it's a good idea to use this slow operation there.
>
> Or maybe you have a different alternative in mind ?
page->end was introduced to have a unique pointer for each slab. The
counter that you introduces can take over that role. So we could use a
NULL pointer again as the end of the objects? Or some constant?
I am going to revert the change that introduced page->end for 2.6.25 since
it seems that the new fastpath does not need this. It was specific to the
old fastpath.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists