[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802291224290.17889@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:28:13 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
cc:	Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25] module: allow ndiswrapper to use GPL-only
 symbols
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> 
> This still leaves us with the workqueue interface:
> 
> __create_workqueue_key
> destroy_workqueue
> flush_workqueue
> queue_work
Hmm. Personally, I don't see those as being a big issue, but they've been 
marked GPL-only for a long while. 
The thing is, I personally don't mind, and I think "derived code" is what 
matters, but others disagree, and quite frankly, I'm not going to force 
them - I have my _personal_ beliefs, but hey, others have theirs.
So you really need to talk to not me, but to the people who actually wrote 
and maintain that code. When they come back and say "yeah, we think 
ndiswrapper is a special case and we're ok with it", I'll happily either 
mark those things non-GPL or just mark ndiswrapper special in the module 
loader again.
Quite frankly, I don't care about ndiswrapper enough (at all) to push this 
along in the least. 
		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
