[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080229174007.0a934cc6@mandriva.com.br>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:40:07 -0300
From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@...driva.com.br>
To: serge@...lyn.com
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ch.ncsc.mil>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, buraphalinuxserver@...il.com,
elendil@...net.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] file capabilities: remove cap_task_kill()
Em Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:38:17 -0600
serge@...lyn.com escreveu:
| The original justification for cap_task_kill() was as follows:
|
| check_kill_permission() does appropriate uid equivalence checks.
| However with file capabilities it becomes possible for an
| unprivileged user to execute a file with file capabilities
| resulting in a more privileged task with the same uid.
|
| However now that cap_task_kill() always returns 0 (permission
| granted) when p->uid==current->uid, the whole hook is worthless,
| and only likely to create more subtle problems in the corner cases
| where it might still be called but return -EPERM. Those cases
| are basically when uids are different but euid/suid is equivalent
| as per the check in check_kill_permission().
|
| This patch removes cap_task_kill().
2.6.24 seems to have the same bug, what about a rediff for it and
submit the patch to -stable team?
Thanks.
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists