[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080229124605.24c49ed5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:46:05 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc: eibach@...ys.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: add sysfs configuration interface for CP2101
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:44:37 +0000
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:02:45AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:02:18 +0100 Dirk Eibach <eibach@...ys.de> wrote:
>
> > We have a new strict_strtoul() (and related functions) which will perform
> > proper checking for a valid number. Please use that interface.
> >
> > Andy, this is going to happen so much that a "should you have used
> > strict_strtoul?" warning in checkpatch would reduce my email output.
>
> Sure, will add something. I wonder if this new interface is documented.
It has kerneldoc.
> I note that this interface is new in -mm at this time.
It is in mainline.
> So that brings
> up an interesting question as to how one would integrate this check with
> checkpatch. As checking patches for mainline, this would be an
> incorrect check until that patch merges. I guess the right thing to do
> is provide a separate patch for checkpatch which adds this check which
> should sit with the patch in your tree which adds the functionality.
>
It would be easier to just update your kernel tree ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists