linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] make /proc/pid/pagemap work with huge pages and return page size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1204325172.4175.31.camel@cinder.waste.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:46:12 -0600
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adam Litke <aglitke@...il.com>,
	nacc <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jon Tollefson <kniht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Adam Litke <agl@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] make /proc/pid/pagemap work with huge pages and
	return page size


On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 14:30 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:15 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > The only issue is that this is *after* the code has decided that a
> > > particular virtual area is for huge pages.  The best arch-generic
> > > interface I know for that is: is_vm_hugetlb_page(), but that is
> > > VMA-based.  Perhaps we should change the pagemap walk to pass the VMA
> > > around. 
> > 
> > I'd rather avoid that. Requiring a VMA to poke at these things shouldn't
> > -really- be necessary.
> 
> Yeah, this is strictly true.  But, it also assumes that we have all of
> the data about where large pages are based on the contents of the
> pagetables alone.  It's possible that we can derive this, or code up a
> bunch of arch-specific functions to do this, but it certainly doesn't
> exist today.  I'm just not keen on going and learning about how each and
> every architecture encodes hugetlb information in their pagetables. :(
> 
> The fact is that we treat pagetables in hugetlb areas completely
> differently than normal pages.  All of the generic functions that deal
> with pagetables magically punt over to the hugetlb code when they see a
> hugetlb VMA.
> 
> I think although it isn't strictly necessary, it is going to save a ton
> of work to just pass the VMAs around.

Well in any case, step 1 should be to finalize the interface. Let's
start with a single patch that does nothing but move the exported bits
around and makes room for the page shift bits. Are we agreed on what
that should look like now?

ps: my laptop died on Tuesday, so I'll be struggling to even read email
until its replacement arrives.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/