[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080229010055.GA26176@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:00:55 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dave Quigley <dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
viro@....linux.org.uk, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
bfields@...ldses.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Security: Add hook to get full maclabel xattr
name
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:32:47PM -0500, Dave Quigley wrote:
> I can always go with the original hook name of get_security_xattr_name
> which turns into a security_get_security_xattr_name call which seems a
> bit ludicrous. The only other complaint that I saw from Casey besides
> the name of the function was that there could be more than one xattr. If
> we want to address that then I need another hook that says give me all
> data that the LSM deems important for this file. Which is essentially
> the same thing as taking each of the xattr names that the module will
> provide, grabbing each of them in turn, and concatenating them together.
> For SELinux this is no different than getsecurity with the selinux
> suffix. The same goes for SMACK.
What about Casey's suggestion of get_security_blob? For any reasonable
module that just has a single xattr it's trivial and for those that
have multiple or a different storage model it might get complicated
but that's not our problem for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists