linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/11] VFS: Add security label support to *notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:23:12 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dave Quigley <dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, viro@....linux.org.uk,
	trond.myklebust@....uio.no, bfields@...ldses.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] VFS: Add security label support to *notify

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 06:44:43PM -0500, Dave Quigley wrote:
> The main reason for this was the way that NFS passes information it
> receives around. If you look in patch 11 you will see that
> nfsd4_decode_fattr doesn't give us access to an inode to use for
> security_inode_setsecurity and it doesn't give us a dentry to use the
> xattr helpers with. The only thing we get here is an iattr structure
> which is then passed back up to fill in the inode fields. Also without
> functionality provided by patch 1 we don't even know where to put the
> security blob we are getting from the wire. 

Take a look at how ACLs are handled.  They're passed up from the _decode
operations into a small structure that is referenced by struct
nfsd4_<operation> and pass it up until the level where the dentry
is available.

> 
> > 
> > > +#define DN_LABEL        0x00000040      /* File (re)labeled */
> > 
> > An any inotify/dnotify additions should be separate from the vfs to
> > filesystem interface.  Please make it a separate patch and describe
> > properly why it's needed in it's description.
> 
> Will do. We added them to conform to the functionality provided for
> other elements in the iattr structure. We will add a more robust
> explanation in the patch.
> 
> > 
> > > index df6b95d..1169963 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/xattr.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/xattr.h
> > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ ssize_t xattr_getsecurity(struct inode *, const char *, void *, size_t);
> > >  ssize_t vfs_getxattr(struct dentry *, char *, void *, size_t);
> > >  ssize_t vfs_listxattr(struct dentry *d, char *list, size_t size);
> > >  int vfs_setxattr(struct dentry *, char *, void *, size_t, int);
> > > +int vfs_setxattr_locked(struct dentry *, char *, void *, size_t, int);
> > >  int vfs_removexattr(struct dentry *, char *);
> > >  
> > >  ssize_t generic_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, void *buffer, size_t size);
> > > -- 
> > > 1.5.3.8
> > > 
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > ---end quoted text---
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---end quoted text---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/