linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Optimise tick_nohz_stop_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:16:34 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Karsten Wiese <fzu@...gehoertderstaat.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimise tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() a bit

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:10:50 +0100 Karsten Wiese <fzu@...gehoertderstaat.de> wrote:

> 
> Call
> 	ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> and
> 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> once instead of twice.
> 
> No functional change done, as changed code runs with local irq off.
> Reduces source lines and text size (20bytes on x86_64).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karsten Wiese <fzu@...gehoertderstaat.de>
> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    6 ++----
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 686da82..851a852 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -158,9 +158,8 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_idle(int cpu)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(int cpu)
> +static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)

Argument `cpu' is now unused.

>  {
> -	struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
>  	ktime_t now, delta;
>  
>  	now = ktime_get();
> @@ -201,8 +200,8 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(void)
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>  
>  	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -	now = tick_nohz_start_idle(cpu);
>  	ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> +	now = tick_nohz_start_idle(cpu, ts);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If this cpu is offline and it is the one which updates
> @@ -222,7 +221,6 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(void)
>  	if (need_resched())
>  		goto end;
>  
> -	cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	if (unlikely(local_softirq_pending())) {
>  		static int ratelimit;
>  


--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c~optimise-tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick-a-bit-fix
+++ a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_idle(int cpu)
 	}
 }
 
-static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
+static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(struct tick_sched *ts)
 {
 	ktime_t now, delta;
 
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(void)
 
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
-	now = tick_nohz_start_idle(cpu, ts);
+	now = tick_nohz_start_idle(ts);
 
 	/*
 	 * If this cpu is offline and it is the one which updates
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/