[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080301124203.GL24533@paranoidfreak.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:42:04 +0000
From: Simon Huggins <huggie@...th.li>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
Subject: Re: Scheduler broken? sdhci issues with scheduling
(please cc me)
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Simon Huggins <huggie@...th.li> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:34:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Simon Huggins <huggie@...th.li> wrote:
> > > > [ Please Cc me on replies ]
> > > > I had a bug with sdhci which Pierre Ossman looked at for me.
> > > > In the end essentially the fix was to use HZ=1000 and nothing else.
> > > > Pierre seemed to think that this was a bug in the scheduler.
> > > does the patch below help, even if you keep HZ=100? This doesnt look
> > > like a scheduler issue, it's more of a timer/timing issue. Different HZ
> > > means different msleep() results - and the mmc code does a loop of small
> > > msleep delays.
> > Thanks for looking at it.
> > I did tests with 2.6.24.3 with HZ=1000 and HZ=100 and as expected the
> > latter didn't work.
[..]
> > That doesn't work. I did a test with HZ=100 and this patch. I've
> > attached the log as patch1-log.
> > Anything else I can try?
> so neither precise, nor imprecise timings help??
I don't know. I don't really understand the patches I applied I'm
afraid; I'm just reporting the results.
I've cc'd Pierre Ossman so he might have a look from the sdhci point of
view.
Pierre, the thread starts here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/29/118
Simon.
--
Just another wannabie | "It's so nice to have a big | Just another fool
----------------------+ strong spud around the house." +-------------------
This message was brought to you by the letter E and the number 13.
htag.pl 0.0.22 -- http://www.earth.li/projectpurple/progs/htag.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists