linux-kernel - Re: Scheduler broken? sdhci issues with scheduling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:42:04 +0000
From:	Simon Huggins <huggie@...th.li>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
Subject: Re: Scheduler broken? sdhci issues with scheduling

(please cc me)

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Simon Huggins <huggie@...th.li> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:34:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Simon Huggins <huggie@...th.li> wrote:
> > > > [ Please Cc me on replies ]
> > > > I had a bug with sdhci which Pierre Ossman looked at for me.
> > > > In the end essentially the fix was to use HZ=1000 and nothing else. 
> > > > Pierre seemed to think that this was a bug in the scheduler.
> > > does the patch below help, even if you keep HZ=100? This doesnt look 
> > > like a scheduler issue, it's more of a timer/timing issue. Different HZ 
> > > means different msleep() results - and the mmc code does a loop of small 
> > > msleep delays.
> > Thanks for looking at it.
> > I did tests with 2.6.24.3 with HZ=1000 and HZ=100 and as expected the
> > latter didn't work.
[..]
> > That doesn't work.  I did a test with HZ=100 and this patch.  I've 
> > attached the log as patch1-log.

> > Anything else I can try?
> so neither precise, nor imprecise timings help??

I don't know.  I don't really understand the patches I applied I'm
afraid; I'm just reporting the results.

I've cc'd Pierre Ossman so he might have a look from the sdhci point of
view.

Pierre, the thread starts here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/29/118

Simon.

-- 
Just another wannabie |  "It's so nice to have a big   |  Just another fool
----------------------+ strong spud around the house." +-------------------
This message was brought to you by the letter E and the number 13.
htag.pl 0.0.22 -- http://www.earth.li/projectpurple/progs/htag.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/