linux-kernel - Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47C9B443.9000905@zytor.com>
Date:	Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:53:39 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"Klaus S. Madsen" <ksm@...rnemadsen.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending

Klaus S. Madsen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 22:26:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Klaus S. Madsen wrote:
>>>> open("/dev/mem", O_RDWR)                = 5
>>>> mmap2(NULL, 1282, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED|MAP_FIXED, 5, 0) = 0
>>>> mmap2(0xa0000, 393216, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_FIXED, 5, 0xa0) = 0xa0000
>>>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> close(5)                                = 0
>>>> ioperm(0, 0x400, 0x1)                   = 0
>>>> iopl(0x3)                               = 0
>>>> access("/sys/bus/pci", R_OK)            = 0
>>>> write(1, "Calling get_mode\n", 17)      = 17
>>>> vm86(0x1, 0xb7f14ccc, 0xb7f14830, 0xc000, 0x18b6 <unfinished ...>
>>>> --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
>>>> +++ killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped) +++
>>> This is the VGA BIOS being mapped, it's mapped PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, but  
>>> no PROT_EXEC; if the kernel is NX-capable it *should* segfault trying to 
>>> execute out of this area, which is exactly what will happen when vm86 
>>> executes INT 10h.
>>>
>>> If we can find that mmap() in the s2ram source code and add PROT_EXEC 
>>> to it, it would be interesting.
>> Klaus, could you send your .config as well? Lets make sure that NX is 
>> even relevant in this context.
> Allright. The mmap in question is in the x86-common.c file in libx86,
> and adding PROT_EXEC to it solves the problem.
> 
> I have attached my .config.
> 
> The only thing I don't understand is why this is suddenly a problem with
> 2.6.25, and not with 2.6.24? Is there a bug in 2.6.24 and previously
> that allows real-mode execution of non-executable pages?
> 

One wonders, especially since the checkin it was bisected to it had 
nothing to do with NX.  I suspect there is either a bug in the NX logic, 
which this checkin inadvertently fixed(!), or there is an ad hoc hack 
that should probably never have existed.  More investigation necessary, 
but now we know a lot more.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/