[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47CAF614.5050206@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:46:44 -0600
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>
CC: htejun@...il.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, efault@....de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> sum(sg) == rq->data_len is already broken; sg sends such requests
> (though it would be nice if it doesn't).
>
Actually, I think I was half wrong on that when you asked about
scsi_debug. The scatterlist that sg.c uses is never seen by the block
layer or scsi layer. It is just used as a container to hold segments.
sg.c and st.c use their scatterlist to manage their preallocated
pages/segments. When they pass it to scsi_execute_async, that function
will create a request struct and add bios for the pages.
In 2.6.24 and below, sg.c will send a scatterlist length that does not
match the IO length, and scsi_execute_async will goof up and send a
rq->data_len that does not match the sum of the bios. That is what I was
trying to fix in 2.6.24, but the patch got messed up. In 2.6.25-rc2 and
above that is fixed and scsi_execute_async will catch sg.c doing this
and set rq->data_len and the bio lengths correctly.
So hopefully that helps any fixes you might have planned.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists