linux-kernel - [RFC] breakage in 4223cc34365e4 (h8300: uaccess.h update)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080302232314.GW27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:23:14 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC] breakage in 4223cc34365e4 (h8300: uaccess.h update)

	After that commit in asm-h8300/uaccess.h we have 

#define get_user(x, ptr)                                        \
({                                                              \
    int __gu_err = 0;                                           \
    uint32_t __gu_val = 0;                              \
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {                                   \
    case 1:                                                     \
    case 2:                                                     \
    case 4:                                                     \
        __gu_val = *(ptr);                                      \
        break;                                                  \
    case 8:                                                     \
        memcpy(&__gu_val, ptr, sizeof (*(ptr)));                \
                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

which, of course, is FUBAR whenever we actually hit that case - memcpy of
8 bytes into uint32_t is obviously wrong.  Why don't we simply do

#define get_user(x, ptr)                                        \
({                                                              \
    int __gu_err = 0;                                           \
    typeof(*(ptr)) __gu_val = *ptr;                             \
    switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {                                   \
    case 1:                                                     \
    case 2:                                                     \
    case 4:                                                     \
    case 8:                                                     \
        break;                                                  \
    default:                                                    \
        __gu_err = __get_user_bad();                            \
        break;                                                  \
    }                                                           \
    (x) = __gu_val;                                             \
    __gu_err;                                                   \
})

and be done with that, anyway?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/