[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47CA3C60.8080402@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:34:24 -0500
From: Allan Menezes <amenezes007@...patico.ca>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: HPL Benchmark performance degradation of kernel 2.6.24.3 vs 2.6.23.14
Hi,
I have a five node intel Q6600 quad core cluster and I benchmarked
it with open source open mpi software using fc8 and it's supplied
kernels recompiled and that of kernel.org with kernel 2.6.23.14 and
2.6.24.3.
With GotoBlas v 1.24 and open mpi beta both cases (v 1.3a) for kernels
2.6.23.14 with web100 i get 158GFlops.
But when i recompile with web100 for kernel 2.6.24 / without web100 and
having 6gig DDR2800MHz ram on each node i get only 28GFLOPS AND
22GFLOPS for 5 nodes whereas with or without web 100 for kernel
2.6.23.14 i get 156-8 GfLOPS. wITH OR WITHOUT web 100 i get for kernel
2.6.24.3 22- 28 Gflops for 5 nodes.!
Why is there a performance drop in kernel 2.6.24.3 All else hardware is
the same!
For inter node communication i use three pci express gig eth cards ( 2
intel and one syskonnect ) per node and using nptcp of netpipe their
performance of intel and syskonnect cards in both kernels measured point
to point is 880MBPS approx for all three cards with measured using
netpipe for tcp with kernel 2.6.24.3 and 2.6.23.14 . I am also using
three switches gigabit with high bisection b/w for these eth cards
(copper) with 3 different subnets
Yet I am getting a substantial performance drop keeping the hardware and
openmpi and hpl and gotoblas same. Can some one help me figure out why?
Please find attached my kernel's .config
Cheers,
Allan Menezes
Download attachment ".config" of type "application/xml" (63826 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists