[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803021041560.17707@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:44:29 +0200 (EET)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: assertion (packets <= tp->packets_out) failed
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Ray Lee wrote:
> Wireless below is b43, wired interface (tg3) was disconnected. I run
> openvpn which uses a tun interface and regularly sends a heartbeat
> even when not in use. The trace appeared twice.
>
> Likely unrelated but reporting just for completeness: about fifteen
> minutes after this the system oopsed when I told my wireless base
> station to switch from mixed B/G to just B. I'll be taking that up
> separately with the bcm43xx list.
>
> Mar 1 11:06:37 phoenix kernel: [35251.208275] eth1: switched to short
> barker preamble (BSSID=00:16:01:d1:44:3e)
> Mar 1 11:06:37 phoenix kernel: [35251.320282] eth1: switched to long
> barker preamble (BSSID=00:16:01:d1:44:3e)
> Mar 1 11:08:28 phoenix kernel: [35274.396163] KERNEL: assertion
> (packets <= tp->packets_out) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (2139)
> Mar 1 11:08:29 phoenix kernel: [35274.406126] ------------[ cut here
> ]------------
> Mar 1 11:08:29 phoenix kernel: [35274.406132] WARNING: at
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2506 tcp_ack+0xe3f/0x1b12()
Do people ever look into archives before posting? I'm a bit tired of point
to the debug patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120418703023153&w=2
--
i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists