linux-kernel - Re: [patch 11/21] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080302092350.684ca7f6@bree.surriel.com>
Date:	Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:23:50 -0500
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 11/21] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim

On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:35:44 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> I think this patch is very good improvement.
> but it is not related to split lru.
> 
> Why don't you separate this patch?
> IMHO treat as independent patch is better.

Agreed, I should probably pull this to the start of the patch series
and submit it to Andrew Morton soon.

The arrayification of the LRU lists and pagevecs should probably go
into -mm soon, as well.  That code is ready and it can be merged
independently of the split VM code.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/