lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080302153503.GD3861@ucw.cz>
Date:	Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:35:04 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Pawel Plociennik <paplociennik@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] chroot= as a new kernel parameter

Hi!

> hi *real* hackers,

:-).

> it is a my first post to lkml and I hope that you will have not been
> ignored me if I have done some incorrect thing.
> 
> In the short this patch has added a new chroot= kernel parameter which can be used
> to changing a chroot of an init process before it will has been runed.
> I use that for testing variouses distroes without making a separate partition but
> by copied a new root-fs to a new subdirectory on the my *base* filesystem.

Yes please. I was thinking about doing this long ago, but never got to
coding it.


> diff -urp linux-2.6.24-orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt linux-2.6.24/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> --- linux-2.6.24-orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt	2008-02-25 20:53:26.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.24/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt	2008-02-25 20:51:21.000000000 -0500
> @@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. 
>  			Value can be changed at runtime via
>  				/selinux/checkreqprot.
>  	
> +	chroot=		[KNL] call chroot() for init proccess.
> +
>  	clock=		[BUGS=X86-32, HW] gettimeofday clocksource override.
>  			[Deprecated]
>  			Forces specified clocksource (if available) to be used
> diff -urp linux-2.6.24-orig/init/main.c linux-2.6.24/init/main.c
> --- linux-2.6.24-orig/init/main.c	2008-03-01 12:58:37.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.24/init/main.c	2008-02-25 20:36:06.000000000 -0500
> @@ -755,8 +755,22 @@ static void __init do_pre_smp_initcalls(
>  		spawn_softlockup_task();
>  }
>  
> +static void *chroot_str;
> +static int __init chroot_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +	chroot_str = str;
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("chroot=", chroot_setup);
> +
>  static void run_init_process(char *init_filename)
>  {
> +	if(chroot_str) {

'if ('

> +		if(sys_chroot(chroot_str) < 0)

here too.

> +			printk("chroot=%s failed\n", chroot_str);
> +		else
> +			printk("chroot=%s successed\n",chroot_str);

And I do not think we want to printk in the success case.

Thanks, 
							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ