linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix /proc/net in presence of net namespaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m14pbp51cf.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:03:28 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc:	serge@...lyn.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix /proc/net in presence of net namespaces

- The experience from vserver, planetlab and OpenVZ is that it is good
  to be able to monitor processes in other namespaces.  

- The linux experience says filesystems are a good way to do that.

- So we really want to filesystem monitoring interfaces to depend on
  the filesystem mount options instead of current.

- Starting with making /proc and sysctls depend on current is a cheap
  way to get things up and going.

- When I consider breaking things up into multiple filesystems I run
  across the occasional file that depends on multiple namespaces.
  uids in /proc/sysvipc/* for example.  Luckily I have yet to find
  any directory structures that depend on more then one namespace.

  Maybe that can be handled properly by capturing multiple 
  namespaces at mount time but I am a bit leery of that.

- The visibility of namespaces should be match the visibility of the
  processes that use them.   Access control of course can be more
  restricted.

- We want to see how namespaces connect to tasks.

Therefore.

/proc/net, /proc/sys, /proc/sysvipc, and probably a few others
should migrate under /proc/<pid>/task/<tid> (not under /proc/<pid>
so we can finally straighten out the task group vs task issue).

Todays problem of course is /proc/net/

What I had intended to implement was:
/proc/current -> /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>
(A new symlink to the task directory)

/proc/net -> /proc/current/net
(like /proc/mounts)

The only downside of placing files under the task directory is
that we use a lot more dentries for /proc.

....

Optimizations.

If the dentry pressure is significant and we don't have data from
other namespaces in the files causing us to want to present the
information differently for different processes I support using
an id and a per namespace upper level directory.  With a symlink
into there from the task directories.

/proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/net -> ../../.../netns/<netns id>

The id I would use is a struct pid because that makes the id useful
for userspace monitoring and control applications and because we
can migrate it.

In my view /proc/netns/<pids> would be implemented like
/proc/<pids> with readdir and lookup returning different contents
based upon the pid namespace captured when we mounted proc.

Further struct pid would be enhanced so that as long as we have
a namespace using a struct pid as an id we would not free that pid_nr
in any of the pid namespaces.  Just like we do with process groups
and sessions today.

I think for the network namespace and network /proc files that
optimization is safe.  I seem to recall checking and not finding any
ids from other namespaces in the files under /proc/net.

I will try for some more detailed replies.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/