[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:21:13 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: tomof@....org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, efault@....de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>> I can't see what changing the meaning of rq->data_len (and
>>> investigating all the block drivers) gives us.
>> No matter which way you go, you change the meaning of rq->data_len and
>> you MUST inspect rq->data_len usage whichever way you go.
>
> The patch doens't change that rq->data_len means the true data
> length. But yeah, it breaks rq->data_len == sum(sg). So it might break
> some drivers.
Yeah, that's what I was saying. You end up breaking one of the two
assumptions. As sglist is getting modified for any driver if it has DMA
alignment set, whether rq->data_len is adjusted together or not, sglist
and data_len usages have to be audited.
>> Apply your patch and try to do sg IO on IDE cdrom w/ various
>> transfer lengths.
>
> I've just tried the patch with both ata and libata and it seems to
> work.
Right, I missed you added extra_len in libata and IDE isn't using block
layer stuff yet.
> For anyone hitting this problem, please try the following patch:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/2/218
Whether rq->data_len stays with requested data buffer size or sum(sg), I
think we need to separate out padding from address alignment; otherwise,
we'll have to audit every block driver to make sure they can deal with
extended sglist no matter which value rq->data_len ends up indicating.
If padding is applied iff explicitly requested, rq->data_len indicates
matters only to the drivers which want to see the data length adjusted,
so most of the problems go away.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists