[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:17:02 -0500
From: Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Panic 2.6.24-3 NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU 0
Thomas,
I have booted many times over the weekend. I've yet to trigger the watchdog. Since I used to see problems
in 1 in 3 or 4 boots, I think you fixed the problem with patch below.
Thanks
Ed
On March 1, 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been seeing these since I installed .24 kernels. It does not seem to matter if I change the clocksource from tsc
> > to apci_pm. Its happened with all .24 kernels I have tried starting with stock 2.6.24 upto 2.6.24-gentoo-r2 + 2.6.24-3
> >
> > Ideas?
>
> Questions first. Is there a particular reason to use idle=poll ?
>
> Idea: does the patch below help ?
>
> Thanks,
> tglx
>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.24/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.orig/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ linux-2.6.24/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@ -212,14 +212,13 @@ void cpu_idle (void)
> current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
> /* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
> while (1) {
> + tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick();
> while (!need_resched()) {
> void (*idle)(void);
>
> if (__get_cpu_var(cpu_idle_state))
> __get_cpu_var(cpu_idle_state) = 0;
>
> - tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick();
> -
> rmb();
> idle = pm_idle;
> if (!idle)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists