[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 10:37:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
cc: mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bill.huey@...il.com, kevin@...man.org, cminyard@...sta.com,
dsingleton@...sta.com, dwalker@...sta.com, npiggin@...e.de,
dsaxena@...xity.net, ak@...e.de, pavel@....cz, acme@...hat.com,
gregkh@...e.de, sdietrich@...ell.com, pmorreale@...ell.com,
mkohari@...ell.com
Subject: Re: [(RT RFC) PATCH v2 4/9] optimize rt lock wakeup
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> It is redundant to wake the grantee task if it is already running
This is only expensive for your adaptive mutex algorithm, not what is in
there today. It belongs _after_ the adaptive mutex patch in the series.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists