[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:08:20 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] introduce pm_call() macro to get rid of most #ifdef
CONFIG_PM
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 02:43:08 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com> wrote:
> Currently drivers handle CONFIG_PM this way:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> drv_suspend() {}
> drv_resume() {}
> #else
> #define drv_suspend NULL
> #define drv_resume NULL
> #endif
>
> struct driver drv = {
> .suspend = drv_suspend,
> .resume = drv_resume,
> };
>
> With this patch, the code above converts into:
>
> drv_suspend() {}
> drv_resume() {}
>
> struct driver drv = {
> .suspend = pm_call(drv_suspend),
> .resume = pm_call(drv_resume),
> };
>
> GCC will optimize away suspend/resume calls if they're really
> not used.
>
to be honest, at this point I would think it's time to remove CONFIG_PM, or rather,
just make it always be there and just get rid of the ifdefs. We're saving 2 words and a bit of code,
but only a case that not even the embedded guys use.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists