[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:58:33 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Klaus S. Madsen" <ksm@...rnemadsen.org>,
Suspend-devel list <suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> if s2ram worked before, and breaks with v2.6.25 then it's a regression.
> It doesnt really matter that this segfault is the right thing to do ...
>
I'm sorry, I have to disagree with this one, simply because it's a
security model violation. We can't just say "well, app X does this even
though it's forbidden, well, let's just put in a security hole for it."
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists