linux-kernel - Re: Performance versus FreeBSD 7.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47CCE36D.3020000@gmx.net>
Date:	Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:51:41 +0100
From:	Cyrus Massoumi <cyrusm@....net>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>,
	Stephen Cuppett <cuppett@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: Performance versus FreeBSD 7.0

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Cyrus Massoumi <cyrusm@....net> writes:
>> IIRC, going to fine-grained file locking gave them a huge boost in
>> this particular benchmark (and maybe others).
> 
> What locking? You mean their equivalent of i_mutex? There are 
> already file systems on Linux that don't use it significantly
> for write.
> 
>> As I said on lwn.net Peter Zijlstra posted a patch to break the global
>> file list lock about a year ago [1], but I don't think it was ever
>> merged. Here [2] are some numbers for the patchset.
> 
> The file_list_lock is only for open/close which MySQL is very unlikely
> to do in its fast path. You're totally on the wrong path here I think.

Yes, Nick already corrected me, sorry for the noise :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/