linux-kernel - Re: 64-bit AMD panic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:11:41 +0100
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>
Cc:	"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Christian Kujau" <lists@...dbynature.de>,
	"Linux kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit AMD panic

On 03/03/2008, linux-os (Dick Johnson) <linux-os@...logic.com> wrote:
>
<snip>
>
> That's the problem trying to support devices in production.
>  The last kernel I was able to locate for the x86_64 project
>  is linux-2.6.23. Its dates are from late last year so maybe
>  it will work!
>
>  It is now being compiled one one of the target machines.
>  If this works, I'll have to find the differences between
>  the old and the newer and patch the linux-2.6.11 because
>  it is a "certified" kernel, i.e., selected by the FAA and
>  determined to be politically correct!

So, you take a "certified" kernel, then you patch it, which leaves you
with what? Certainly not a certified kernel. You might as well go with
the latest 2.6.24.3 sources then...

>
<snip>
>

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/