| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9a8748490803031611m4ad2cd7dr16e30e7cb003c05f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:11:41 +0100 From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com> To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com> Cc: "Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>, "Christian Kujau" <lists@...dbynature.de>, "Linux kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 64-bit AMD panic On 03/03/2008, linux-os (Dick Johnson) <linux-os@...logic.com> wrote: > <snip> > > That's the problem trying to support devices in production. > The last kernel I was able to locate for the x86_64 project > is linux-2.6.23. Its dates are from late last year so maybe > it will work! > > It is now being compiled one one of the target machines. > If this works, I'll have to find the differences between > the old and the newer and patch the linux-2.6.11 because > it is a "certified" kernel, i.e., selected by the FAA and > determined to be politically correct! So, you take a "certified" kernel, then you patch it, which leaves you with what? Certainly not a certified kernel. You might as well go with the latest 2.6.24.3 sources then... > <snip> > -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists