[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080304002521.2e67d7a5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 00:25:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: srinivasa <srinivasa@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ananth@...ibm.com,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] To refuse users from probing preempt_schedule()
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:27:40 +0530 srinivasa <srinivasa@...ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Srinivasa Ds <srinivasa@...ibm.com>
>
> This patch prohibits user from probing preempt_schedule(). One way of
> prohibiting the user from probing functions is by marking such
> functions with __kprobes. But this method doesn't work for those functions,
> which are already marked to different section like preempt_schedule()
> (belongs to __sched section). So we use blacklist approach to refuse user
> from probing these functions.
>
> In blacklist approach we populate the blacklisted function's starting
> address and its size in kprobe_blacklist structure. Then we verify the user
> specified address against start and end of the blacklisted function.
> So any attempt to register probe on blacklisted functions will be rejected.
>
> please let me know your comments.
>
sparc64:
kernel/kprobes.c: In function `in_kprobes_functions':
kernel/kprobes.c:516: error: `kprobe_blacklist' undeclared (first use in this function)
kernel/kprobes.c:516: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kernel/kprobes.c:516: error: for each function it appears in.)
kernel/kprobes.c: In function `init_kprobes':
kernel/kprobes.c:860: error: `kprobe_blacklist' undeclared (first use in this function)
> ---
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 7 ++++++
> kernel/kprobes.c | 52
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.25-rc3/include/linux/kprobes.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc3.orig/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc3/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,13 @@ struct kretprobe_blackpoint {
> const char *name;
> void *addr;
> };
> +
> +struct kprobe_blackpoint {
> + const char *name;
> + unsigned long start_addr;
> + unsigned long range;
> +};
> +
I'm assuming that the placement of this definition inside
__ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT wqs accidental?
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-prevent-probing-of-preempt_schedule-fix
+++ a/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -72,6 +72,18 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex); /* Protects
DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kretprobe_lock); /* Protects kretprobe_inst_table */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, kprobe_instance) = NULL;
+/*
+ * Normally, functions that we'd want to prohibit kprobes in, are marked
+ * __kprobes. But, there are cases where such functions already belong to
+ * a different section (__sched for preempt_schedule)
+ *
+ * For such cases, we now have a blacklist
+ */
+struct kprobe_blackpoint kprobe_blacklist[] = {
+ {"preempt_schedule",},
+ {NULL} /* Terminator */
+};
+
#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT
/*
* kprobe->ainsn.insn points to the copy of the instruction to be
@@ -89,18 +101,6 @@ struct kprobe_insn_page {
int ngarbage;
};
-/*
- * Normally, functions that we'd want to prohibit kprobes in, are marked
- * __kprobes. But, there are cases where such functions already belong to
- * a different section (__sched for preempt_schedule)
- *
- * For such cases, we now have a blacklist
- */
-struct kprobe_blackpoint kprobe_blacklist[] = {
- {"preempt_schedule",},
- {NULL} /* Terminator */
-};
-
enum kprobe_slot_state {
SLOT_CLEAN = 0,
SLOT_DIRTY = 1,
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists