[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803041119.44283.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:19:44 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.sg>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lguest@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lguest: make sure cpu is initialized before accessing it
On Tuesday 04 March 2008 10:15:47 Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2008 02:53:17 Eugene Teo wrote:
> > If req is LHREQ_INITIALIZE, and the guest has been initialized before
> > (unlikely), it will attempt to access cpu->tsk even though cpu is not yet
> > initialized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.sg>
Thanks Eugene, I've applied this with some wrapping of the comments and
removal of the now-redundant lg != NULL tests:
> > + /* Once the Guest is dead, all you can do is read() why it died. */
> > + if (lg && lg->dead)
> > + return -ENOENT;
> >
> > - /* If you're not the task which owns the Guest, you can only break */
> > - if (lg && current != cpu->tsk && req != LHREQ_BREAK)
> > - return -EPERM;
> > + /* If you're not the task which owns the Guest, you can only break */
> > + if (lg && current != cpu->tsk && req != LHREQ_BREAK)
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists