linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] add ALL_CPUS option to stop_machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:30:52 -0800
From:	Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] add ALL_CPUS option to stop_machine_run()

Hi Rusty,

> On Saturday 01 March 2008 06:15:59 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Right now the answer is: "if you want to do hard RT then avoid doing
>> things like loading modules". (which you should avoid while doing
>> hard-RT anyway)
> 
> Hi Ingo,
> 
>      I agree, but Max is doing a service by making more people aware of the 
> limitations of stop_machine so they don't sprinkle it around like candy :)
Exactly. I'm glad we're on same page on this.

> I think the module load case can be reasonably fixed; it's in my backlog now.
Great. I might get some time later this week to think about this some more and 
try things out. So if you have ideas/suggestions let me know.

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/