[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p73prua6coc.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:50:11 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
astarikovskiy@...e.de, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> This was 2.5.x - you'll need to look in the historical-git tree.
>
> Here it is:
>
>
>
> : commit 4507a6a59cfc6997e532cd812a8bd244181e6205
> : Author: akpm <akpm>
> : Date: Tue Mar 11 07:42:00 2003 +0000
> :
> : [PATCH] work around gcc-3.x inlining bugs
> :
> : Force inlining even when gcc-3.x is too confused to do it for us.
I think these old inlining bugs were just caused by missing __always_inline
(e.g. in the vsyscall code which requires forced inlining or in copy_*_user)
AFAIK these all have __always_inline these days and if any are still missing these
are easy to change over as needed.
So Ingo's change is likely ok.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists