linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080304102804.GA17681@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:28:04 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org,
	hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v3


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:

> Split the FPU save area from the task struct. This allows easy 
> migration of FPU context, and it's generally cleaner. It also allows 
> the following two optimizations:

hm, i didnt get a reply from you to:

    http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/3/47

I'm uneasy to apply patches without knowing whether previous problems 
are fixed. In the changelog there's a mention of:

  v3: Fixed the non-atomic calling sequence in atomic context.

is that the same bug?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/