| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080304122037.GA29777@elte.hu> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:20:37 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jikos@...e.cz, jack@...e.cz Subject: Re: wmb() confusion in system.h * Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote: > Hi! > > Comment says wmb is a nop, but it is implemented as lock addl below... > Should it be compiled to nop if we know we are running on "good" Intel > cpu? > > At least remove confusing comment for now. agreed - that comment is pretty much out of date. I've applied your patch. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists