lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080304150213.GI24386@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:02:13 -0700
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Make Andrew's life easier


Andrew recently complained that feature-removal-schedule.txt is always
generating conflicts.  The reason is clear; everybody adds to the
bottom of the file.  The solution he proposed is to place entries at
random places in the file.  However, we can make the tools work for
us here quite simply by adding a separator at the bottom of the file.
Then diff produces a patch which contains no meaningful context and
patch will happily put new entries into the file in a random order.
Unfortunately, git-cherry-pick won't, but I don't think Andrew uses it,
so he'll be happy anyway.

This will fail if people subsequently fail to add a separator at the
bottom of a file.  But then those people can be legitimately grumped at.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>

diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index c1d1fd0..325e5b4 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -328,3 +328,6 @@ Why:	Not used in-tree. The current out-of-tree users used it to
 	code / infrastructure should be in the kernel and not in some
 	out-of-tree driver.
 Who:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
+
+---------------------------
+

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ