linux-kernel - Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2008 20:55:34 -0500
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	"barrioskmc@...il" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:38:52 +0900
"barrioskmc@...il" <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:04:14 +0900
> > "minchan Kim" <barrioskmc@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> One more thing.
> >>
> >> zoneinfo_show_print fail to show right information.
> >> That's why 'enum zone_stat_item' and 'vmstat_text' index didn't matched.
> >> This is a problem about CONFIG_NORECLAIM, too.
> > 
> > In what configuration do they not line up, and why?
> > 
> > AFAICS the #ifdefs in zone_stat_item and vmstat_text match up...
> > 
> 
> So sorry, It was my mistake.
> I seem to have a bad eye :(

Not at all.  You found a number of real issues with my patch series,
which I have fixed today.  I am happy that people like you take a
good look at my patches, so I get a chance to improve them.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/