[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0803041558070.15986-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:00:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bugs in MMC [was: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card
is inserted]
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> > What's wrong with a superfluous probe at resume time, besides the waste
> > of a few milliseconds?
>
> I'm more concerned with the undesirable removal of devices at suspend
> time ... ones with mounted filesystems etc.
On that we can agree. The removal is done if the host doesn't define a
resume method. There doesn't seem to be any point to that, given that
the probing during resume will determine whether a card has in fact
been removed.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists