[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47CDC85D.6080004@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:08:29 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Klaus S. Madsen" <ksm@...rnemadsen.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Suspend-devel list <suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending
Klaus S. Madsen wrote:
>>> But I'm a bit puzzled by the fact that I'm aparently the only one how
>>> have encountered the problem? Maybe it's only a problem if one also
>>> uses PAE? (Thats just a wild guess to explain why I'm the only one
>>> seeing this).
>> PAE activates NX on 32-bit. So we probably had an NX regression that got
>> fixed by the side-effects of one of the unifications. Does it start
>> working if you disable NX via the noexec=off boot option?
> If I boot with noexec=off, s2ram starts working again.
As one can expect.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists