[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080304233027.GA15302@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:30:27 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Klaus S. Madsen" <ksm@...rnemadsen.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Suspend-devel list <suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:11:17PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >>
> >>PAE activates NX on 32-bit. So we probably had an NX regression that
> >>got fixed by the side-effects of one of the unifications. Does it
> >>start working if you disable NX via the noexec=off boot option?
> >
> >What's the state of play here? Is upshot that this change fixed a bug
> >which broke s2ram, or caused a bug which broke s2ram?
> >
>
> As far as I can tell, this change fixed a bug, and the fact that the bug
> was fixed triggered a s2ram bug.
Strictly a libx86 bug, so I'll try to get an updated version uploaded in
the near future. This won't hit x86_64 users, since the code is run
through x86emu rather than executed directly.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists