linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/9] Audit: internally use the new LSM audit hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0803041514090.14650@us.intercode.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:15:47 +1100 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
cc:	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Audit-ML <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	LSM-ML <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] Audit: internally use the new LSM audit hooks

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Paul Moore wrote:

> I've looked over patches #7, #8, and #9 and they look okay to me, but 
> I'm not tagging them 'Reviewed-by' because they go beyond areas of the 
> kernel that I feel comfortable reviewing at this point.

Indeed, deep audit patches need to be acked by the likes of Al Viro (cc'd, 
who possibly should also be added to the MAINTAINERS entry for audit).


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/