[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080305070454.3df78593@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:04:54 +0100
From:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adam Belay <abelay@...ell.com>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] cpuidle: avoid singing capacitors
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:34:06 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:04:46PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think I quite see the point. If we can't force an update, then
> > it doesn't really help us knowing if the jiffies value is stale or not.
> 
> What do you mean with force an update? The system always does an 
> jiffies update automatically after idle wakeup. It's just that if you add 
> code to the code path that uses jiffies you have to make sure it is after the 
> standard update, otherwise you'll see a stale value.
> 
I still don't follow. Perhaps you can express it in pseudo code? If I have a stale value that I cannot refresh, knowing that it is stale doesn't change anything.
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman
  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
